CapitalCandor
Demo mode — showing Fieldglass Analytics, a hardcoded example profile, scored against the real scoring library and seed investor dataset.Run onboarding with your own startup

Fieldglass Analytics

Usage-based analytics for B2B SaaS finance teams.

Fundraise Readiness

92/ 100
traction growth
95
market
100
team
100
differentiation defensibility
100
business model economics
75
ask clarity
100
narrative clarity
75

Strengths

  • Market scores 100/100 — Market size and clarity of the opportunity.
  • Team scores 100/100 — Founder-market fit and completeness of the founding team.
  • Differentiation & Defensibility scores 100/100 — Why this startup wins vs. alternatives.

Risks

  • Narrative Clarity scores 75/100 — Whether the deck/story communicates the startup's case clearly.
  • Business Model & Economics scores 75/100 — Early-stage economics are graded leniently; a clear pricing hypothesis is enough.
  • Traction & Growth scores 95/100 — Early-stage traction is graded on directional signal (early users/revenue/growth rate), not absolute scale.

Missing information

Pitch deck

Investor matches

Worth Pursuing (2)

Moss Creek Ventures

vc fund · Raleigh, NC

92/ 100
Worth PursuingConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 2 business-model match(es) across 2 portfolio companies.
  • 2 of 2 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Potential concern

Startup HQ falls outside the investor's stated geographic focus.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Shipframe when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: May 14, 2026

Meridian Seed Partners

vc fund · San Francisco, CA

87/ 100
Worth PursuingConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
67
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 2 sector match(es) and 4 business-model match(es) across 4 portfolio companies.
  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.

Potential concern

Startup HQ falls outside the investor's stated geographic focus.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Ledgerly when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: July 14, 2026

Opportunistic (15)

Cobalt Reach Capital

vc fund · Phoenix, AZ

70/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
50
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.
  • Direct overlap with stated sector focus.

Potential concern

0 sector match(es) and 0 business-model match(es) across 2 portfolio companies.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Payframe when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: June 14, 2026

Summit Line Capital

vc fund · Denver, CO

68/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
67
Recent Investment Behavior
33
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.
  • Direct overlap with stated sector focus.

Potential concern

Startup HQ falls outside the investor's stated geographic focus.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Queryframe when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: July 14, 2026

Cascade Row Capital

vc fund · Seattle, WA

67/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
33
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "either"; round needs a lead.
  • Direct overlap with observed sector focus.

Potential concern

0 sector match(es) and 0 business-model match(es) across 3 portfolio companies.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Routewell when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: May 14, 2026

Birchgate Partners

vc fund · Minneapolis, MN

62/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 1 business-model match(es) across 1 portfolio companies.
  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.

Potential concern

Startup's stage falls outside the investor's stated range.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Fortline Security when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: August 14, 2024

Amberline Partners

vc fund · Chicago, IL

59/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
70
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 2 business-model match(es) across 2 portfolio companies.
  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.

Potential concern

0 of 2 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Millframe when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: May 14, 2026

Palisade Ventures

vc fund · San Francisco, CA

58/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
67
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's observed lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.
  • Direct overlap with stated sector focus.

Potential concern

0 of 3 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Tradepost when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: June 14, 2026

Thistledown Capital

vc fund · Nashville, TN

57/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 1 business-model match(es) across 1 portfolio companies.
  • 1 of 1 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Potential concern

No overlap with stated or observed sector focus.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Tablewell when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: November 14, 2025

Outland Robotics Fund

vc fund · Pittsburgh, PA

56/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 1 of 1 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.
  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.

Potential concern

0 sector match(es) and 0 business-model match(es) across 1 portfolio companies.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Armature Systems when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: December 14, 2025

Solace Health Ventures

vc fund · San Diego, CA

56/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
50
Recent Investment Behavior
50
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "either"; round needs a lead.
  • Expected allocation falls within the investor's stated typical check range.

Potential concern

No overlap with stated or observed sector focus.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Careloop Health when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: March 14, 2026

Backyard Orbit Ventures

vc fund · Huntsville, AL

56/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 1 of 1 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.
  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.

Potential concern

0 sector match(es) and 0 business-model match(es) across 1 portfolio companies.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Apogee Dynamics when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: April 14, 2026

Ironwood Family Office

family office · Chicago, IL

55/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
70
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 1 business-model match(es) across 1 portfolio companies.
  • Direct overlap with stated sector focus.

Potential concern

0 of 1 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Parcelframe when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: December 14, 2024

Ridgeback Technology Partners

vc fund · Dallas, TX

53/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 1 business-model match(es) across 1 portfolio companies.
  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.

Potential concern

0 of 1 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Corewell Systems when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: March 14, 2026

North Star Angels

angel · New York, NY

49/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Why they fit

  • 0 sector match(es) and 2 business-model match(es) across 2 portfolio companies.
  • Direct overlap with stated sector focus.

Potential concern

0 of 2 investments in the last 18 months match the startup's stage.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Draftline when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: March 14, 2026

Greenline Deep Tech

vc fund · Boston, MA

49/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
50
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "lead"; round needs a lead.
  • Expected allocation falls within the investor's stated typical check range.

Potential concern

0 sector match(es) and 0 business-model match(es) across 2 portfolio companies.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Voltframe Materials when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: June 14, 2026

Wavecrest Ventures

vc fund · Los Angeles, CA

49/ 100
OpportunisticConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
95
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
50
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Why they fit

  • Investor's stated lead/follow behavior is "either"; round needs a lead.
  • Expected allocation falls within the investor's stated typical check range.

Potential concern

0 sector match(es) and 0 business-model match(es) across 2 portfolio companies.

Talking points

  • Reference their investment in Reelbase when explaining why you reached out.
  • Lead with your seed traction — it's the dimension this investor weighs most in recent deals.

Last verified: May 14, 2026

Show 9 lower-priority / insufficient-data investors
Fernhollow Seed Fund

vc fund · Portland, OR

42/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Last verified: April 14, 2026

Lumen Path Ventures

vc fund · Salt Lake City, UT

42/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
100
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Last verified: February 14, 2026

Tidewater Growth Partners

vc fund · Miami, FL

40/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
60
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Last verified: February 14, 2026

Brightfield Capital

vc fund · Austin, TX

35/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
92
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
50
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Last verified: June 14, 2026

Keystone Bridge Capital

vc fund · Philadelphia, PA

34/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Last verified: May 14, 2026

Redletter Emerging Managers

vc fund · Atlanta, GA

34/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
95
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Last verified: June 14, 2026

Obsidian Frontier Capital

vc fund · Palo Alto, CA

32/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
30
Portfolio Similarity
100
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Last verified: July 14, 2026

Harborlight Ventures

vc fund · Boston, MA

28/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
70
Portfolio Similarity
33
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
20
Lead / Follow Preference
100

Last verified: April 14, 2026

Windward Oceanic Capital

corporate vc · Houston, TX

21/ 100
Low PriorityConfidence: Low
Sector / Thesis
10
Funding Stage
18
Check Size
70
Portfolio Similarity
0
Recent Investment Behavior
0
Geography
60
Lead / Follow Preference
20

Last verified: January 14, 2026